Quantcast

Overclock Your Reading Speed

This is a guest post from Kim Roach of The Optimized Life.

In today’s Information Age, reading is now a prerequisite for success in life. In fact, many presidents, including Kennedy, have required their staff to take speed reading lessons.

Brian Tracy, a best-selling author, points out that just 1 hour per day of reading will make you an international expert in your chosen field within 7 years.

If you’re looking to increase your learning rate while decreasing your effort, speed reading is a method you should consider studying. By simply learning how to process information at a more rapid rate, you’re not only going to be able to move through books more quickly, but you will also be able to comprehend and process more of what you have read. Speed reading is an excellent skill that can be used in your workplace, your home life, as well as your personal hobbies.

The Brain’s Power
Speed reading actually began as part of military training to identify enemy war planes. Pilots used a pacing tool called a tachistoscope that flashed images before their eyes at increasing speeds. This allowed the pilots to quickly identify the enemy planes in order to attack as needed. With the hundreds of possible planes that could be used in the military setting, this rapid identification was literally the tool that made a life and death difference.

But what was interesting about this method of military training is that it began to unveil the idea that the brain could process more things visually than was previously thought. Even with hundreds of images, the brain was able to identify them and then make decisions based on messages in the right side of the brain.

What many people don’t realize is that the mind becomes bored when it’s not constantly stimulated. When you are reading at your normal rates, the mind will become bored and begin to lose interest in what you are trying to learn. It’s not that you aren’t a good student or a proficient reader, it’s just that your mind is made to do more than you are asking of it.

Hearing the words in your head
At this average speed, most of us are actually reading the words to ourselves in our head, which is known as subvocalizing. This is where you are ‘hearing’ the words in your head, or even saying them to yourself as you read. A behavior like this slows down your reading significantly, so it’s the first thing to go when you’re learning to speed read.

To eliminate subvocalizing, you must practice reading faster than you can actually read. You can practice this skill with an online tool known as Spreeder.

Of course, there are times when subvocalization is a good idea — as in the case of dense texts or subjects with which you’re not familiar. Science and math are such subjects. In these cases, you might need to slow down your reading style to make sure you comprehend what is being taught. Others choose to read more slowly when they want to savor what they are reading, like fiction or poetry.

However, when you are reading subjects that you need to learn quickly, speed reading can come in handy.

A How-to Guide
Here are some techniques that will help you to increase your reading rate:

1. Realize that reading is not from beginning to end, but rather point to point. When you are reading, you need to pick up the important points of the book, but that doesn’t mean that you need to read them in a particular order.

In fact, I would suggest skipping parts of a book that you don’t need. Almost every book has a good point or two, but it is highly unlikely that you need to read every page of the entire book.

2. Try using a pacing tool. Whether it’s your finger or a pencil, try moving this tool along the lines of the book you are reading to keep you moving forward as quickly as possible.

Reading is a series of jumping snapshots called saccades. Using a visual guide prevents regression.

By moving your pacing tool faster than your normal reading rate, your eyes get used to viewing text faster than your brain can process the actual words on the page. This will enable you to break the habit of subvocalization.

3. Get rid of all distractions and possible interruptions. When you are trying to focus on what you are reading, you need to be in a comfortable seat in a quiet room. Distractions can severely interrupt your reading patters and decrease your comprehension of the text.

4. Try to read more than one word at a time. This is a speed reading technique known as chunking. By looking at ‘blocks’ of words as you read, you will allow your mind to process ideas and visual images instead of individual words.

5. Never move backwards. When you are speed reading, the main point is to keep moving forward and not stop to reread something. This is the most inefficient use of your reading time. Keep yourself moving forward at all times.

6. Think visually. One of the most effective speed reading techniques is to visualize the ideas on the page as pictures in your head. Huge portions of the human brain are dedicated to processing information visually, making them the fastest circuits in the brain for processing information.

Mind maps are one of the best ways to process information visually. Begin using the same visual process in your head while reading.

As you practice and become more proficient at speed reading, you will be amazed at what you can do.

Kim Roach is a productivity junkie who blogs regularly at The Optimized Life. Read her articles on 50 Essential GTD Resources, How to Have a 46 Hour Day, What They Don’t Teach You in School, and Free Yourself From the Inbox.

Brilliant comments (50)

Gravatar

Dror Engel Says:

May 21st, 2007, 6:10 am

I Liked the post :) thanx
I will be more then happy to read other posts about mind maps

Dror.

Gravatar

John Mark Rozendaal Says:

May 21st, 2007, 7:06 am

I skimmed this post rapidly, looking for the major points.

I am replying in paragraphs of one sentence, for easy reading.

It is dreadful style (strictly forbidden by style manuals), but easy to read.

It is acutally ubiquitous in major newspapers.

Reading a prerequisite for success in life in this information age?

Was this actually written during the Kennedy administration?

Would you call being president of the United states of America “success in life.”

Do you think that reading has been an important part of GWB’s rise to power?

The information age is actually giving more power than ever to right-brainers, non-linear and visual thinkers, including precisely the people who often read less fluently, people whose learning/thinking/working styles have been undervalued in the past.

Gravatar

John Mark Rozendaal Says:

May 21st, 2007, 7:15 am

Reading speedily for success? Speed? “Success?” What kind of Zen - do is this?

“When you are reading at your normal rates, the mind will become bored and begin to lose interest in what you are trying to learn.”

The solution to this one is to find a BETTER BOOK and read it very slowly for pleasure and inspiration, savoring details, enjoying singular words, and backing up frequently for depth of understanding.

Gravatar

John Mark Rozendaal Says:

May 21st, 2007, 7:17 am

Does anyone have any good ideas about how to eat, sleep, breathe, dance, make love, or listen to music faster?

Gravatar

Leo Says:

May 21st, 2007, 7:22 am

John … I appreciate your alternative viewpoint but Kim wrote this as my guest and I’d appreciate it if you treated her kindly. I actually enjoyed the post, and though I’m not a speed reader myself, I thought it was fascinating and well done.

Thanks, Kim, for writing this post!

Gravatar

Jay Says:

May 21st, 2007, 8:31 am

While one can get through reading material in less time, there is a decrease in information intake. There have been studies testing speed reading, photo reading, or what ever marketing term you want to slap on it. You will be able to read faster, but you will not retain as much. Also there is a marked decrease in comprehension.

In Australian schools (New South Wales to be specific), they tested the efficiency and effectiveness of speed reading, to determine if it should enter the curricular. It proved to be a waste of time and resources.

So, it comes down to what your requirements and goals are. If you just read to have read, go for it. If you read to broaden your knowledge, accumulate information, and gain insight, read as you feel comfortable.

Speed reading effectively is browsing.

Gravatar

Jennie Says:

May 21st, 2007, 9:49 am

Leo - I’ve tagged you with the Thinking Blogger Award.

Gravatar

Tantowi Says:

May 21st, 2007, 9:58 am

Those techniques aren’t as easy as they seem and require some practice.

Small leaps down the text can really make your eyes whizz along the page. This can also be achieved with a diagonal motion.

Gravatar

Samantha Says:

May 21st, 2007, 11:11 am

This speed reading doesn’t feel very zen to me. Interesting but, but not zen.

Gravatar

Scott Young Says:

May 21st, 2007, 11:41 am

I have to disagree with Kim about the never re-reading stuff. This is more important when you are speed reading then not. Rereading paragraphs can help them sink in. Sometimes a lot of value you personally get from a book is contained in just a few sentences.

Gravatar

GWB Says:

May 21st, 2007, 12:04 pm

This can be a useful tool, but at times problematic. While it might be useful to skim through a book of cooking recipes, doing the same for a book you need to analyze, or through the LSAT you happen to be reading is career suicide. However, if you spend most of your time reading subjects that are not dense then this could be quite useful. The question then becomes, why am I reading children’s stories?

Gravatar

rohit Says:

May 21st, 2007, 12:44 pm

interesting post, the comments for this post are very divided. I would prefer to have the skill of speed reading so that we can identify what information is important and what is not, rightly said in one the comments speed reading is like browsing but something which is very handy

Gravatar

Elia Diodati Says:

May 21st, 2007, 15:20 pm

“Brian Tracy, a best-selling author, points out that just 1 hour per day of reading will make you an international expert in your chosen field within 7 years.”

OMG what have doing all this time in graduate school?! I should have taken up speed reading instead!

Gravatar

Kim Roach Says:

May 21st, 2007, 15:20 pm

Thanks for all of the feedback guys! It looks as though there are a number of different opinions on speed reading, which is good. There were some excellent comments made here.

Scott Young made a very good point about zoning in on the important parts of a book and he is absolutely correct. There are times when you just need to slow down to absorb as much information as possible.

However, there are also other times where speed reading can be very useful.

Gravatar

eli Says:

May 21st, 2007, 15:37 pm

what i’m interested in is the idea of actually getting your mind to process more information faster, so that you’re comprehension is just as high as it would be at a lower rate. I think the point is that many of us have a settled, slower reading rate that we apply to the morning paper with our cup of tea, but that in our worklife there are many documents that we would do well to get through faster. So, there is one idea of speed reading where you are giving yourself a headache because you can’t keep up with your eyes, but another where you increase your baseline of understanding.

I’m also interested in the fact that some people are naturally faster readers than others. I think it’s either a genetic ability or a trained behavior. The fastest reader I know was reading long books at age 4. I think your mind, as a muscle, gets well trained with practice.

I’d love to either other people’s theories on this.

Gravatar

Sweet Deals Says:

May 21st, 2007, 17:07 pm

Skipping parts of books and not reading from cover to end are very helpful tips.

Gravatar

Curtis Says:

May 21st, 2007, 17:21 pm

I picked up the ability to speed-read at a relatively young age, as a result of cramming before tests. While this is not as good for technical manuals, and things with large amounts of minor details, it truly does help for learning about subjects in general. Obviously, different people’s minds work in different ways, and different methods will work for each individual.
Still, a nice article, always nice to see people using their minds, no matter the subject material :D

Gravatar

MonsieurX Says:

May 21st, 2007, 17:23 pm

It’s cool to do this trick but only if you’ve mastered the art of lots of info storage management in you brain first! sooner or later it will pile up! ;)

Gravatar

John Mark Rozendaal Says:

May 21st, 2007, 19:08 pm

Leo,

I recognize that my tone in comments above is acerbic (at least). I will not take it amiss if you choose to delete them.

In a more moderate voice (I hope):
Zen, as I understand it is about process nore than product, more about the journey (the Toa, Dao, Do) than the desitination. I’m not sure that speed and “success” as the later term has been used in recent years are really good Zen Values.

Gravatar

Leo Says:

May 21st, 2007, 19:22 pm

@John Mark: I won’t delete your comments, but just ask that you treat my guest posters kindly. You can be mean to me if you like! :)

This guest post by Kim isn’t meant to be Zen, I think, and I’m sorry if that’s not clear. I asked her to write a post about productivity, and she did a fantastic job. I think my perspective leans more towards the Zen mindset, although as I noted elsewhere I am not a practitioner of Zen Buddhism.

But I agree: it’s about the journey, and productivity should be used as a way of making the journey more enjoyable. Speed reading can be useful in some situations, though, and although I wouldn’t use it to read my favorite fiction novels (Vonnegut, Gibson, Fitzgerald …), I wouldn’t discount it as a tool.

Gravatar

Wolfger Says:

May 21st, 2007, 19:23 pm

I think this is a great idea, but while the article talks *about* speed reading, it’s not really very instructional. I’ve had over 30 years of practice at subvocalizing. That’s not a habit I can break with a simple “here’s why you should, and here’s a link to a tool to help” with no instructions. I used Spreeder a few times…. I was either subvocalizing *faster*, or I was missing information. Or both. It’s kinda like handing a child a gun and saying “here, this is a tool to help feed yourself”. Without instruction on how to use the tool properly, it’s not much use.

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 21st, 2007, 21:07 pm

I am a natural speed reader and also a mathematician. Novels,
magazines etc, I read at about 1500 wpm with complete comprehension. I have done this since childhood.

I often do use my finger to pace. And you don’t need fancy software on a screen–all you need is a wheel mouse, which can scroll the text at any speed you want.

Math does require lots more time–especially to fill in the missing
arguements in proofs–but, it does help to rapidly preview and rapidly review the material.

In short, speed reading works just fine. I have read thousands of books that way.

If you subvocalize, try holding a pencil between your teeth–that will stop it.
Penny

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 21st, 2007, 21:15 pm

As to school studies that speed reading doesn’t work–perhaps it depends on what they mean by speed reading? Reading at 10,000 rpm probably only works on drivel. But, perhaps, they also don’t really want people to have such skills?

In the same way, they spend six to eight years teaching arithmetic and most people can’t even add a column of three figure numbers in the head. IF you simply add the numbers horizontally ( think of it as money), it is very simple. As a child, I learned something called the Tractenberg system of speed math from a book in the public library–and I could multiply eight digit numbers quite quickly in my mind and do five digit divisions in the same way.

I also learned a simple associative memory system as a child–again from a book–that allowed me to memorize pi ( as a stunt) to a thousand places in about two hours–easily. It really helped with history and languages–and again schools taught neither.
I think the reason for school is to make people intellectually INCOMPETENT.
Penny

p.s.Speed reading, speed arithmetic, and memory systems all go back thousands of years—but, they don’t work?
Penny

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 21st, 2007, 21:17 pm

Wheel mouse:
Just push down on the wheel and a marker will appear on the screen—if you move the marker below the cursor, the text will scroll automatically at a speed proportional to the distance between the marker and the curser.

Great for speed reading practice.
Penny

Gravatar

Gerrit Says:

May 21st, 2007, 22:42 pm

Speed Reading does work, and your comprehension is actually better.

Imagine if you processed images by getting VERY close to them and thinking about one small part, then stopped thinking about that and then looked at the next small part, and so on - it would take you a minute to look at someone’s face, and by the time you got to their chin you would forget what their eyes looked like!

The foundation of speed reading is to give something a quick glance (yes, a skim) first, then go back and read it at a faster rate that normal, which you will be able to do once you know the lay of the land, so to speak.

Gravatar

epicurus_lite Says:

May 21st, 2007, 23:16 pm

In my opinion speed reading is a bad idea.

First, a great thing about digging into a ‘deep’ book (not talking about bodice rippers or technical documentation here) is that it trains the mind to focus. Most if not all of the classics are impossible to finish without really buckling down and thinking hard about them in what is essentially a form of meditation. Perhaps in today’s ADD-riddled television world it only matters how many books you can get through in a short time period, but if one wants to become a better reader (and a better person), speed reading is not the way to go about it.

By speed reading you train your mind to do things in a half-ass speedy way. By reading the traditional way you train your mind to do things the *right* way. Reading literature the old-fashioned way is simply the best practice for teaching oneself to slow down and take things easy. If you’re too busy to truly read a book front to end maybe you should reconsider why you’re reading in the first place.

Second, if a speed reader takes the pepsi challenge with a non-speed reader, the speed reader will get less from *any* book than someone who took the traditional approach. Scientists have done the research on this — see the speed reading wikipedia page which examines the false claims of its proponents. Anyone who says they can speed read a book like Seneca’s On The Shortness of Life and understand it is lying, plain and simple.

Now for the caveat: Speed reading does have its place. It’s a great way of “faking it” if you don’t have time or need to read thoroughly — very useful in college or business. It’s perfect for getting through vast amounts of not-very-important documentation or in instances where you only need to know a bare outline but not specifics. Still, anyone who speed reads a book like Lolita or Crime and Punishment just doesn’t “get it” and should probably stop reading altogether. Speed reading is great, but only if it’s used in moderation.

Gravatar

epicurus_lite Says:

May 21st, 2007, 23:20 pm

And to respond to speed readers who claim they do read better, I call BS. Here’s a relevant passage from the wikipedia article:

“One interesting outcome from research into speed reading is that speed readers tend to poorly assess their own comprehension level when compared to normal readers who are simply instructed to skim a text (Allyn & Bacon, 1987). The skimming group was found to be better at extracting the details out of a text than speed readers. This may be explained with reference to speed reading practices training out the ability to judge comprehension (Allyn & Bacon, 1987) and leading the reader to adopt misconceptions about reading (Harris and Sipay 1990).”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading#Scholarly_research

Gravatar

AKS Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 0:35 am

Guys, the core point is - how to increase your speed of reading, if you want to. NOT - why should you try to increase your reading speed. If you love it slow & easy, suit yourself.

Gravatar

Joel M Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 0:43 am

I don’t read much leisure material, so most of my reading is for self-improvement, or for business reasons. For that reason I do often want to be able to “power through” a book, and picked up a book on speed reading to help me with that process.

I once had a very important interview with a very prominent franchise owner, so I bought a copy of the book everyone at that company was required to read. (Anyone in the real estate industry can probably guess the title, but that’s not the point.) The book was about 400 pages. I bought it the night before the interview, and was able to power through it in a couple hours. Skimming? Some might say so, but what I retained in the two hours I spent reading 400 pages was invaluable for that interview.

I actually even surprised myself with the amount of information I retained, and the person I met with even commented that I seemed to know more about the company philosophy and main principals than many of the agents that worked at his company.

The naysayers who love to “curl up in front of a fire and enjoy a good book” might be offended at the idea of wanting to get through written material posthaste, but I think that sometimes, it’s just a necessity.

Great post Kim.

Gravatar

MJS Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 4:29 am

To those like John Mark Rozendaal, who, in response to this line in Kim’s original post:

When you are reading at your normal rates, the mind will become bored and begin to lose interest in what you are trying to learn.

proclaims:

The solution to this one is to find a BETTER BOOK and read it very slowly for pleasure and inspiration, savoring details, enjoying singular words, and backing up frequently for depth of understanding.

You should be less confident about your assumptions (you do know what they say about those who make improper assumptions) on topics you clearly know little about.

Obviously, much of Kim’s advice seems counterintuitive — otherwise, it wouldn’t be post-worthy, now would it? If it made sense intuitively, we’d all already be practicing speed reading, or at least understand why we should be doing it.

First off, I have been practicing speed reading for about five years. And yes, it is a lot of work, and yes, it takes an enormous amount of effort when you are first trying it. And yes, it is no fun to read things for “pleasure and inspiration” quickly, let alone the fact that doing so defeats the purpose.

But, sometimes, there is material we don’t have the time or desire or need to read for pleasure, and utilizing speed reading effectively allows us to make time for those things we do want to read for pleasure.

Further, I know she is right because it is clearly manifest when I do it myself: When you focus more intently, a prerequisite of speed reading, you are forced to not lose interest in what you’re reading, for two reasons. One, by singularly focusing on the task at hand, but in a manner that is constantly reinforcing that focus toward an end other than just reading the material itself (rather, you are focusing on how you read the material), your ability to maintain focus, better, more effectively, and for a longer period of time, is greatly enhanced. With greater focus, comes greater comprehension. It doesn’t seem like reading faster would actually increase comprehension, but, partly because you must concentrate so much harder on the task at hand — reading, albeit at a faster rate — you do, counterintuively, increase your comprehension.

Second, by turning reading of otherwise dry or boring or lengthy, even if it is perhaps somewhat interesting, material into a sort of game or self-challenge, your concentration is also heightened.

As to her recommendations on how to practice speed reading, she is right on, and in a knowledgeable manner, to boot. If you don’t buy into her tips and points, and you’re one of those who can’t really throw themselves into something unless they know it works, I recommend reading a book which goes into further detail. There are a couple very popular ones that have been around for a while which are relatively short reads (even without speed reading them) that do a great job of engagingly explaining Kim’s tips in greater detail. (I can’t remember which ones off the top of my head, but check out the top sellers at Amazon, I’m sure they’re listed.)

The three most important tips I can give for speed reading are:

1. Use your finger or a pen for pacing — it is essential to breaking the subvocalization “sound barrier.” And, breaking the habit of subvocalization is absolutely essential to effective speed reading. It will take a lot of work to break this lifelong habit. Which lead me into my second point…

2. As you first being trying it, be prepared for intense efforts at implementing the techniques. The first few weeks (you need to practice a little bit every day) you will be literally physically exhausted from the intensity necessary for the focus, if you do it right. (But, once you get the hang of it, the rewards are well worth it.)

3. Do — like John recommends (his one good point incidentally…hey, even a broken clock is right twice a day) — take quick breaks every 5-10 minutes to think about what you are reading. These breaks should only be a few seconds, just to make sure you are “getting it” and integrating your understanding into the bigger picture of what you are reading.

Also, I have tried it with reading on screen with computer monitors, and unfortunately, I have had little success. The techniques just don’t work well on monitors. I say unfortunately because, nowdays, I spend most of my time reading online. Guess I need to invest in a printer which doesn’t necessitate ink cartridge replacements every 100 pages — at least ’till tablet/electronic paper technology advances enough to be as effective as the dead tree version.

Gravatar

dajolt Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 6:24 am

If want to speed up your kids and your own reading, I suggest, you watch every DVD and every TV show with subtitles. TV subtitles are great, because try train you to catch them with one glance.

In my opinion speed reading is great in assessing the value of any text. It’s like browsing through the supermarket. You look around and find out, if there’s anything you want and where to find it.

Interestingly, this article doesn’t mention actual speed reading speed goals. I would have liked some goals here.

To find out more I looked up reading rates on Wikipedia and here the highest rate (Skimming) was defined at up to 700 words per minute. For my own taste, that’s pretty slow. At that speed it would take 6 minutes to read the whole article and comment section (when I was reading this). I put they whole thing into speeder.com and ran it at 700 speed and I was clearly hearing every word in my head while looking at the words. (Maybe that’s the 20 years of watching subtitled TV doing their job)

So what rate is a reasonable speed to break the voice barrier?

Gravatar

Joss Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 8:04 am

My reading speed is about 1400 words per minute (with good understanding).
Is that fast enough?

/Joss

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 8:31 am

Epicurus_lite,
Beware assuming that just because YOU need to read these so-called classics slowly and chew them, that everyone needs to.
Some people may be much smarter than you, and think more clearly or they may be able to read the book fast first, then recall EVERY DETAIL and think about it later.

Personally, I never had any problem reading literary, or philosophical “classics” quickly and understanding them easily.
Most of the ideas were actually quite simple for me even as a child. I used to do my sister’s university liberal arts homework for her when I was in elementary school.

On the other hand, reading graduate level math texts requires ( for me) just the state you describe–though I often read first and think later.

I know other people who have such good edietic memory that they don’t have to look twice at any book.

In short, there is a huge range of intellect out there, and speed reading works quite well for many people. It doesn’t work for some.

In the same way, I have to really plod to learn foreign languages and the video method ( like the Capritz method or the Cyber method) fails completely for me. But, I know others with much better brains for languages who find these methods easy and quick.
Penny

p.s. Pascal read the geometry text ( usually hard work for even the best students over a three year period) in an evening–like a pirate novel and demonstrated complete mastery—Men of Math
by E.T. Bell

p.s. Gauss, decided that it was too slow to look up the logarithms
so he memorized the five place log table ( about the size of a large city telephone directory) at a flash.
Ibid.

Never assume that everyone has your limitations–a common error in “gifted classes” at school.

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 8:41 am

Dear e-l,
What I am saying is:
“Different Strokes for different folks”–E.B. White

Only experiment can determine if speed reading works for an individual.

Penny

As to your blanket statement about “Crime and Punishment”, I read that in third grade, in about fifteen minutes, with perfect understanding and enjoyment–nothing super deep there.
Of course, I didn’t read it in Russian—now that would take me YEARS.

Certain things by James Joyce would have been similar–even in “english”: Years.

It depends on the reader. After having been through Greek Tragedy, “C and P” wasn’t so hard. If you are a speed reader and have have READ A LOT of classics, you have a large context bank. It helps.

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 8:48 am

Also, I find it no loss in pleasure to speed read books.
I read every word (as phrases–often a whole paragraph at a glance), and I skip nothing. There is no perceptable feeling of racing or effort. That is just how I read–since childhood.
I suspect that after speedreading for more than a few years, many people will say the same.
I don’t need to slow down or backtrack to savor—in fact, that ruins the flow and the pleasure.
Penny

Speed reading actually improves verbal memory— as a child, I could often quote large blocks of text—and was astonished when others could not. As someone said, it helps to see the text in a larger frame than word by word.

Gravatar

penny Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 9:00 am

thanks dajolt,
I am trying right now to listen to Stargate with french subtitles at
Dailymotion. When it isn’t horribly intimidating, it seems to improve my french understanding.
So your trick even works for foreign languages.
Penny

It’s hard, it’s scary, but it is helping some. Let’s see what several weeks can do.
It would be nice if there were an easy way to capture the titles to circle new words for later lookup.

Gravatar

Jacq Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 11:18 am

When you read, your eyes act like spotlights on a stage. The construction of your eyes only allows them to focus on one small area on the page at a time, so the idea of speed reading is bunk, according to several studies published in the Journal of Vision this month.

Although you might have the illusion that you see the whole page, you can actually only see small groups of letters at the point where your eyes are focused. Only eight or 10 letters fit in this tiny window, called the visual span. The rest of the letters are just a blur, said Gordon Legge, a vision researcher at the University of Minnesota.

So how does anyone ever finish a book as long as “War and Peace?” Readers make a series of eye movements while scanning the page, Legge said.

People typically make four eye movements per second, picking up about four or five words per second and 250 to 300 words per minute. That’s a typical estimate for normal reading speed, Legge said.

Because of the constraints of the visual span, reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible.

“Speed reading is misleading,” said Legge, whose research is published in the March issue of the Journal of Vision. “There’s no magic there. You’re just planting the little island of vision quickly through the page.”

Shrinking window

When viewing conditions are less than ideal, the visual window shrinks, Legge said.

For instance, people with macular degeneration—the leading cause of vision loss in Americans aged 65 or older—read more slowly than people with healthy eyes, even if they’re handed a magnifying glass. The disease affects the macula, part of the retina responsible for central, sharp vision, and forces people to rely on their cloudy peripheral vision [image].

In laboratory experiments, Legge and his colleagues tested how changing different aspects of the visual span, such as character size and contrast, affected the speed at which people read. Reading small print, print with poor contrast, or print with strange spacing also leads to slower reading, Legge told LiveScience.

On the brain

The visual window limits the ability to see things beyond just letters and words, such as icons on a computer desktop or Waldo in a “Where’s Waldo” puzzle. In a second study published in the journal, scientists have plotted how these visual scenes appear on the brain.

The sharpest vision occurs in the fovea, the center of the macula where receptors in the eye’s retina are most tightly packed. This information is then sent to the primary visual cortex in the brain.

“The differing densities of the receptors in the retina are mapped in the brain onto the primary visual cortex in such a way that it’s stretched so that a lot more cortex is dedicated to the fovea than the periphery,” said Brad Motter, a neuroscientist at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Syracuse.

The objects we look at appear on the surface of the brain in decreasing size, where the focal point is greatly magnified, and the objects farther away are smaller, Motter told LiveScience [image].

As in a “Where’s Waldo” puzzle, crowded objects limit our ability to find targets in the visual scene.

Motter, along with his colleague, Diglio Simoni, looked specifically at people’s ability to search for images on a computer screen. They showed that the proximity of objects that surround what a viewer is trying to focus on also determines how quickly a viewer can search out the target object.

“We found that finding the target was dependent on the density of things on the screen,”

Gravatar

Jacq Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 11:20 am

Therefore Speed reading just a Gimmick…

Gravatar

John Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 12:15 pm

In order of things you want to speed up
Swallow whole
Polyphasic technique
Hyperventilate
Go to a rave
Ask the Japanese
and you’re on your own on the music :)

I’m sure you’re response had a sarcastic tone but eh, it was all in good fun.

“John Mark Rozendaal Says:
May 21st, 2007 at 7:17 am

Does anyone have any good ideas about how to eat, sleep, breathe, dance, make love, or listen to music faster”

Gravatar

Jacq Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 15:25 pm

Joss my friend you are too fast..i meanit depends if you are actually processing comprehinsively with 1400 words pre minute.Good luck : )

Gravatar

Stephan Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 19:50 pm

Why on earth is everyone so against reading more quickly?

Reading is one of the greatest levers you can have. How many books are out there that condense years, even decades, of study, research and work into something you can experience in a matter of hours?

I’ve been tested twice and can read at 2000 wpm with full comprehension. I am a long way from the Guinness Book of World Record speed reading holder of 25,000 wpm.

Gravatar

karenlim Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 20:21 pm

I think the whole idea about spead reading is to read more about a certain field. This is an important step to increase our knowledge.

I don’t really apply speed reading but will try it out with these tips in the blog.

Now, I just squeeze in as much time to do reading on Law of Attraction so that I can write relevant posts in my blog at http://www.secretofunlimitedprosperity.com

I read when I am community, I read in the morning, I read at night. SOmetimes I port in ebooks into my palm and read it during my lunch. I hardly spend time watching TV but spend quantity time in reading and blogging about how to get Law of Attraction work in our life

I strongly believe reading , whether at our leisure speed or high speed will result in us raising our awareness about how certain things can be done better and faster.

Reading Zenhabits has also become a habit. Thumbs up!

Gravatar

Adam Snider Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 22:14 pm

Speed reading is probably great for doing research and/or business reading. I don’t necessarily employ these same techniques, but I do skim a lot of my work-related reading materials (I read at least a dozen different marketing blogs, plus visit several online forums related to my job every day).

But, when it comes to reading novels and the like, I don’t like to speed read. When I’m reading for pleasure, well, it’s for pleasure, and I like to savour it a bit.

I sort of agree with John Mark, though I certainly wouldn’t state in such abrasive terms as he did (no offense).

Gravatar

thinsoldier Says:

May 22nd, 2007, 23:03 pm

What I do is speed read 8 pages at a time making no real attempt to retain anything and I’ll notice myself slowing down at parts that are really interesting. I’ll fold the corners of any page this happens on and then a few days later I’ll re-read those pages slowly with lots of backtracking to take in the interesting bits.

Weeks later, if I remember, and if I found the parts I read slowly interesting enough to have a positive overall impression of the book, I’ll go back and speed read the unmarked pages again marking anything that made me slow down.

There are some books though that make me slow down, not because of interest but because they have parts that are just plain boring no matter how fast you try to get through them. Like chapter 14 of The Silmarillion.

Gravatar

Jacq Says:

May 24th, 2007, 9:46 am

Regardless of the above pointed noted i mentioned, which is another way from another point of view.I agree with acceleration the speed for read, where in the fast lane i need to slow down where its needed.

Gravatar

Motorcycle Guy Says:

May 25th, 2007, 8:18 am

I think not subvocalizing is one of the biggest improvements you can make.

Gravatar

Me Says:

September 19th, 2007, 8:46 am

I like how many people are citing research that “conclusively proves” speed reading doesn’t work, without actually trying it and without considering things like what conditions the tests were done under, how participants were chosen, and the fact that we really don’t fully understand the brain. In addition to all that room for error scientific findings are constantly being contested as time goes on. I’m not saying that the research is flawed, just that it seems like your not taking into account all the information. Also, comprehension going down may be besides the point depending on what your reading and nobody said “don’t ever slow down”. Just my 2 cents.

Gravatar

Grigoris Says:

November 9th, 2007, 14:38 pm

Cool…

Gravatar

Shawn Andrews Says:

May 16th, 2008, 12:06 pm

Good page, I was looking for speeding up habit pattern formulation when I got led to this. Very different to what I was looking for, but well done Kim

Gravatar

Dan Says:

July 30th, 2008, 12:49 pm

When you begin to think of reading as receiving the information of reflected light you begin to realize that we are not making a distinction between reading and contemplation.

We have been trained to think this is reading:

Read-contemplate-read-contemplate.

Instead, when you learn to read at mind speed instead of vocal or subvocal speeds you can absorb all of the information in one step (a.k.a. reading) and contemplate it in another handling it comfortably.

This is much more exciting and profound! (The fact that you do it so much faster is more of a nice side effect.) When you can sift through massive amounts of information with understanding (think, light years better than google; understanding means awareness of how one particle of data relates/affects another and fits into the whole) instead of reading and thinking, reading and thinking or grasping for a detail as you contemplate, you experience a quantum leap in human cognition.

If anyone has read Dune, you’ll see that Frank Herbert has already theorized about a bit of the potential of the human “soul”. (Soul to the ancient Hebrews means 1) everything that makes you you, the whole person or 2) the life you enjoy as a soul. Note that it never meant some shadowy thing in humans that is indestructable. I mean it in the first ancient Hebrew usage. I use that term because I believe that we as humans extend beyond the barriers of how we currently define ourselves in terms of our own anatomy/physiology.)

When you begin to read at mind speed you begin to realize that you are more than what the anatomy and physiology books say that you are. Information starts to flow in from the book but then as if you have a connection to the author and the subject themselves information begins to flow from beyond the pages of that book albeit very subtly.

All matter and energy is information and we can gather it, organize it and process it as nothing else in the known material universe can.

The human being alone can then make MORAL decisions in a universe of limitless information. This is something to wonder at. The human brain is the most complex of known physical structures in the known physical universe. Yet it may only be a focal point of quantum based information exchange. That explains how it could possibly be limitless while being material based.

So speed reading (a limiting term) can be a door to amazing growth.

It was mentioned above that someone should come up with a way to “speed up” other areas of life. Yes, when you are able to focus your whole soul on a one thing awesome things happen. It is ALWAYS better to be as focused as you can be when doing anything! Yes, even love making. Far from speeding things up it enriches it immeasureably.

If you go down this road you will eventually realize that you profoundly affect reality with your consciousness. This is a very wonderful way to realize goals in life.

Another application is our hard wired ability (though also a skill you need to develop) to heal yourself and others.

Sorry, if I wrote too much. I just wanted to kind of put out some points to ponder for those that think that we are already near our potential.

Metaphorically, this would be like landing on Mars and declaring that we’ve finally finished exploring the galaxy.

Look up mentat in wikipedia.org. Very interesting.

Add your comment