Reader Poll: How Many Posts a Week is Ideal?

Abhijit Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 5:29 am

One every weekday.

rupert Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 5:33 am

I prefer quality over quantity. Don’t feel the need to ‘produce’ for the sake of filling a quota. Not every day is an A+

Mike Tomasello Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 5:47 am

I agree with rupert. While I’d *like * 5 a week I don’t feel it’s necessary, and I’d rather fewer if it meant you were able to spend more time on each to make them of a higher quality (so I voted ‘4′).

Thomas Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 5:48 am

Also vote for QoQ - not only somebody has to write it, but also somebody has to read it :)

Kristin Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 6:13 am

I voted 5 … meaning I try to get one article length post a week, plus a few shorter “asides” of links, quotes, misc.

Zath Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 6:17 am

I try and post quality content as often as possible, but this means I usually don’t post as often as I’d like due to time contraints.

I certainly try and get at least 3 decent posts out a week, my philosophy really is quality over quantity!

Jaybirdladybug Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 6:18 am

Hi,

Just like to say thatI like the current set up, It’s great, and to have different topics on different days is why I log on and get my daily fix. Also its good that you don’t post on a weekend, its usually to busy for me to take time out to read and digest.

But surely if your true to the site, you should have time to blog anyway. but for me and I guess plenty of others, keep on bloggin’.

Brad Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 7:03 am

I tend to agree mostly with what has been said in the first few earliest comments.

Zen Habits is pretty much the only blog in which I can get something out of every single post. There are not a lot of other blogs out there that can match the quality of Leo’s content.

This said, recently I have noticed more and more guest posts, and some of Leo’s posts have been a little repetitive and lacking in their normal quality.

I kind of expected this to happen, as it has got to be hard for a single writer to consistently write so much quality content. Therefore, I voted that I would like five posts per week, because I still love reading what Leo writes, but as others have stated, if we miss a day because Leo was unable to put something quality together, that is no big deal. I’d happily wait it out to get the high quality production with a couple of rest days in between. It might even help readers with their information overload problems if they have fewer articles in their reader. :P

Leo, do whatever you need to do to keep on creating wonderful content. :)

Anna J Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 7:11 am

I also prefer quality over quantity — especially taking that starting from 2 posts per week is already quite often to comprehend, think over, and put into action.

Lazygal Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 7:18 am

2-3 seems right: if there’s a “need” to blog, the 3rd can be used, but if there’s no real need, then 2 works. Locking yourself into any number seems unZen, you know?

thatch Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 7:58 am

I like the current setup, but if you are cutting back, then consider Monday/Wednesday/Friday.

The finance/family and happiness would be the (reluctantly) disposable topics.

Thanks for your hard work to date.

James Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 8:37 am

I’d say 1-2 /week. Any more feels like spamming (even over an rss reader).

Keep up the good work though ZenHabits.

Cheers,

James

Mary Anne Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 8:41 am

You didn’t offer “as many as you feel like writing” as an option, so I chose five, but it truly doesn’t matter. Whatever keeps you feeling fresh.

Trixi Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 8:47 am

Ditto what Rupert said. And Brad, and Anna . . .

I will readily admit, however, that I selfishly voted for 5!

I respectfully suggest you consider that it doesn’t actually need to be a set number of posts per week. Perhaps you could instead set yourself a minimum (such as 2 or 3), but also write/post more when time and circumstances allow (and/or when desire, inspiration et al demand it).

Regardless of what you decide, there will still remain a treasure trove of your previous posts to visit ~ and re-visit. So fear not, you will certainly not leave your faithful readers high & dry if & when you cut back. Indeed, having additional time to re-visit and ponder (and apply) ideas from some of your previous posts, instead of always digesting a new one, might well be what is actually more needed by, and beneficial to, some of us.

KCLau Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 9:04 am

I’ll prefer quality over quantity

Warren T Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 10:12 am

I’m gong to agree with Mike T - I’ll read as much as you want to post - but I tend to check the RSS feeds Monday through Thursday; there is just too much going on Friday’s to check in…

Woot Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 10:39 am

I remember this poll from a year or so ago. The you asked us how much posts you should do each _day_. You said you were so full of ideas that you could do 5 a day. I guess those days are over now.

For me, two would be fine. The quality of your posts really has decline in the last few months. Better focus on two good ones that go for the big numbers again. You’re a creative person. Keep it that way.

Maryrose Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 10:43 am

You know, if you write them I’ll read them, but more than 3, for me, I don’t really get to think about them. So if there are 3 that are pithy and things I want to think about and 2 “lighter” ones, that would be paradise.

Pete Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 10:58 am

One little voice says: Follow your own minimalist teachings ;)

Eric Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 11:13 am

I voted for 4 (although 5 would be even better). I download these to my Palm via AvantGo and wind up reading it every time it comes out.

The thing I recognize is that you have to put a good deal of thought into these missives to get the quality you aim for.

The critical point is that you feel that the ideas, tips, and philosophy that you present is hitting the target dead-on.

Adam Lehman Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 11:39 am

I just love the stuff your pumping out. I voted 5 because I love it and want MORE….

but do whatever you have to do to make the posts quality…

Joel Sanda Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 11:41 am

I’d say three days a week is good; Monday, Wednesday and Friday. That way I have a day to think about what you wrote and give it a shot ;-). Every weekday is too much, at least for me.

Chuck Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 12:13 pm

Your posts are about life changes, so I think 2 posts a week would allow for more application time and digestion. Maybe that’s just me, though. : )

Kevin Bedell Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 12:34 pm

This question is both easy and hard — 5 posts is great but can impact quality and burn you out. I’m sure you have more to do than just this blog.

I think really only you can answer that question in the end. Try to be responsive to your readers desire to post more frequently, but I think you need to stay within yourself and what you are happy with. Churning out a lot of posts may leave you feeling unsatisfied with what you’re creating — which in the end will be reflected in the work.

I know for myself (blogging at 21st Century Citizen), if I go through times when it’s hard to balance blogging and my ‘real life’, I simply post less often.

If I’m posting to just go through the motions, then that’s unsatisfying — so I sometimes go several days (or more) between posts. Guest bloggers help since I have some that area great, but they really can’t be relied on for ongoing consistent production and quality - they have lives too…

Do what feels right. In the end, that’s what will have the greatest impact anyway.

Rafael Apocalypse Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 12:43 pm

Leo,

one post per day, including the invited writers, more than that is hard to follow, most of us work, and have a lot of other sites/blogs etc… to read… Zen Habits is a great read for week days, most of times make me think about what I’m doing and what I could do to be not just a better person for myself, but for my family, my colleagues, for the word, for the environment…

regards,

RA

Alex Ion Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 12:45 pm

Oh yeah :)

The counter got a 5 from me :)

gwinne Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 13:06 pm

I check Zen Habits daily, though I almost never read the posts that have to do with finance or exercise. But I’d be willing to read as many posts about simplicity and organization as you’re willing to write. I’d say do as many posts as *you* are comfortable doing; as far as I’m concerned, guest posters, while nice, isn’t really the same as reading *your* blog.

FT Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 13:20 pm

Three gets my vote, but I could be satisfied with 2 good posts a week. More than 2 or 3 (particularly when reading 2 or 3 other blogs) gets way too heavy, and then the simplicity lessons get lost in the noise.

katecontinued Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 13:29 pm

I would like to suggest that even if you post 5 times a week, why not tie all 5 to one theme - under your categories (routines)? That way we can get some real depth of research, response. Also, I think it is indicative of life - connecting the disparate dots.

Yes - I would challenge you that any theme could be explored under your 5 routines.

A list, a first pass gives a person a refreshing simple answer to various life challenges. Probing and approaching from a totally different vantage point may uncover more solutions (or more problems) - like life.

Rich Holladay Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 13:37 pm

Post WHAT pleases you WHEN it pleases you.

Andreas Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 14:05 pm

Quality beats quantity!! Your posts really inspire me but I almost never have the time do do what you suggest.

For me 2 good articles are all that i need.

You could make a little shedule so the people know about what topic yo are writing the next week so they could read the posts they are intereseted in.

Mark Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 14:36 pm

Possibly three quality posts per week - Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

Peter Knight Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 15:10 pm

Three - that’s as many as I like to read and have time to think about. - you of course are the judge of how many you like to write - I’ll pick my three favourite :-)

orcmid Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 15:27 pm

You’ve already trained us to what the days of the week are for.

I think you could drop it to 3, with a revised structure, but I think the prevalence of votes for 5 (including mine) has to do with what you have created as a expectation with your current structure.

Eugene (Editor, Varsity Blah) Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 15:51 pm

So far 5 a day works simply because they’re all high quality. But I also agree that it’s more about the content than about how often they get updated. If it’s great, post it. If you need to take a week off, we can just as easily wait!

WS Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 16:11 pm

This is a good example of where you shouldn’t listen to polls, because the majority of people have no clue (IMHO!).

You have to choose between publishing crappy blog-like fluff every weekday or publishing something excellent twice a week (such as ZTD quality articles).

I concur with the other commenters that suggest your quality is dropping.

Wounds from a friend can be trusted…

Leo Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 16:24 pm

Thanks for all the great comments, guys! I really appreciate the input.

First point: I should have put this in the original post, because so many of you were under a misunderstanding, but for me, quality always comes first. Now, you might not always like every post I write, and might think the quality isn’t very good, but I do my best to write quality posts each time.

Basically, I wanted to find out if you would like me to stick with the current schedule of 5 quality posts a week, or if 2-3 would be better.

So what I’m hearing from the poll and comments here is this: 5 quality posts would be best, but if I’m busy or something you’d rather I write 2-3 quality posts than try to stick to 5 posts and write weaker posts. So that’s what I’ll do!

Someone mentioned the high number of guest posts: as I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, those guest posts were meant to cover for me for a few weeks because of a family situation … that situation has calmed down a bit, and I hope to be writing more (with fewer guest posts) this coming week.

Someone else mentioned a similar poll I had a while back, when I mentioned I could write 5 posts a day … I think that was back in February, when I was still feeling out this blog … if you recall, back then, I was writing a lot of shorter posts, commenting on other sites, etc. I could still write 5 of *those* posts a day. But the readers at that time (it was a different crowd then, but still great people) said one a day would be quite enough … and I listened, only wrote one longer post a day, and dropped the short ones. It was good advice and I’m glad I asked.

I’m glad I asked now, too! I’ll try for 5 a week, but if I get behind, you’ll only see 3-4 quality posts from me a week … so be warned! :)

Jean Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 16:52 pm

Hey Leo,

Greedy, little minx that I am, I chose “5.” BUT - I heartily agree with the practice of posting when YOU feel motivated to do so. I’ve felt your writing reflects the experiences you observe as you live your life. You seem totally aligned with what you produce = genuine material. I’m described as “minimalist,” (except when I write!), have the daily zero inbox and white space for computer desktop - my homepage is “Zen Habits.” :-)

Eric Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 17:26 pm

I like 5 post a week. I can’t read all, but the weekly routine is a good idea.

Jan Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 17:42 pm

Hi Leo!

Taking your “becoming a full time blogger”-goal into consideration, I think 5 posts per week is a reasonable number.

Plus: I like your routine of having specific days for each of your topics.

In love with your blog,

Jan

speedy Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 19:18 pm

I prefer quality over quantity. Of course, this is not a problem with your blog, as EVERY posting I have read would be considered very high in quality.

Whatever works best for you is the best for you. I’ll keep reading, regardless of how often or what day of the week you post.

zoom Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 19:25 pm

I voted for five, but I’ve changed my mind after reading the comments. I especially liked what Maryrose said: that any more than three doesn’t give her enough time to think about them.

That’s an excellent point. We absorb so much information in a day from so many different sources, and some of the best stuff doesn’t get enough time in our own internal incubators because we barely have time to scan it all, let alone process it.

Anyway, you’re doing a great job. I know it’s not easy to keep pumping the stuff out day after day. How many posts would YOU like to publish each week?

vonzott Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 19:29 pm

I recognize that 5 times a week is a chore, so I figured that 4 times a week would give you a shot at missing a day here & there… Love the writing. I find that it helps me in ways I hadn’t thought of!

- vz

Jeniffer Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 19:34 pm

Leo:
I have never read a bad Zen Habits post. I trulylove them all. Write when you want, what you want. I’ll still be reading it. The quality of the site is just amazing.
:-}

ikhnaton2 Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 19:47 pm

Well, I like your tips, tricks and ideas but frankly it resides in my blog reader for a month before I read one. This’s not coz it’s bad, in contrast, it’s coz it’s very good and I always postpone reading it until I find a time where I can focus on reading and learn something new. This doesn’t come a lot those days with busy schedules even when I’m taking rest, my brain is put in off mode ;)

Anyhow, regarding your poll, I didn’t find a suitable number, my only advice is don’t care about numbers. I know you like to be organized and to schedule your writing habits but for me writing is free time that I can’t schedule and I can’t imagine how writers force themselves to write everyday in blogs and newsletter even they are empty and not enjoying it!!!

Write when you want to write, when you enjoy to share. This’s all what about ZEN, isn’t it?

andyh182 Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 20:26 pm

One of the first websites I go to every morning!

Greg Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 22:29 pm

I would say a bit fewer than 5 per week, like maybe 2 or 3. I say this because your posts are generally very long and thus take longer to read (compared to most other blogs I read). I would be perfectly happy with 3 per week which is what I voted.
-Greg

cyndi Says:

November 3rd, 2007, 23:01 pm

I didn’t vote. Here’s my thoughts. I will read whatever you post. I don’t always like, agree with, or even on some days completely comprehend (some days just aren’t what I wish they were) what I’m reading. But your posts are comfortable for me. It’s like comfort food for my soul.

I want to read what you post…if you want to post twice a day and feel moved to, then post twice a day. Or post once a day, or take a week off, or have some guest posts. Every post I’ve seen wheter you did it or your guests did it was quality.

I just started reading your blog, but I look forward to it more than anything else I’m reading on the internet right now and I do appreciate your time and your perspective…so might I suggest doing what works for you. Start with a guidleline, but keep is simple and do what feels right for you. I guess that’s what I got from your blog one day when I was reading it…simplifying…it seems simple to do what you are led to do in your heart (which by the way is where I think you are writing from!)

OKay, point made, I’ll quit babbling.

Nick Grimshawe Says:

November 4th, 2007, 1:53 am

I actually post more, but my posts tend to be shorter segments, and I have several guest writers to help keep the pace. But I think for the subject material on your blog, 5 is just right. However, the Muse, must be fed and sometimes, The Muse just doesn’t co-operate, then you just have to bow to the powers that be. I understand its a blistering pace.

I know I am always thinking what my next post is and where the material will come from and where am I going to be and will I get to my computer in time to hit my own self imposed deadlines.

But it is the fun of it all as well.

Interesting topic and a different way of approaching the subject.

Just let your readers do all the work.

Now that I like.

Nick

Noah Says:

November 4th, 2007, 2:50 am

I love your insight. keep posting as much as possible!!

William Says:

November 4th, 2007, 3:44 am

I really like 4 posts a week….so you could have a post- post- reload- post- post- day off- day off sorta schedule….with four you could quite literally post every other day almost….if that would give you the time….funny thing is that you’d ask the masses to make your schedule….

William

Michael Says:

November 4th, 2007, 3:56 am

The decision will become difficult for you. There are really good comments above. From my point of view, another possibility would be to replace the gaps with older posts. They’re still excellent and I’m sure many of your new readers haven’t read them yet. The one’s who have already read a particular older post could easily skip it. Like me there are may be other one’s who have simply forgotten some posts or particular contents of it. Therefore, it would serve as a reminder and no one is forced to lose his or her routine. It’s just a suggestion, so think about it.

I’ll read your posts whether there just two or five. You might become aware of it that English is not my mother tongue. So I read your blog not only because of its excellent content, but also to improve my English. :)

Keep it up!

Maya Norton Says:

November 4th, 2007, 5:05 am

I voted four only because I’d like to see your content in full force, but don’t want to put pressure on you in that direction.

Your posts are so high quality, that I will continue to appreciate whatever you can produce at that level.

Maya Norton
The New Jew: Blogging Jewish Philanthropy

DebW Says:

November 4th, 2007, 6:48 am

I just started reading these posts within the last month. (If the quality has declined like some said, I wouldn’t know.) I find that while it is a refreshing contrast to my regular day, I’ve stopped reading on a regular basis. Why? no time to implement the suggestions and frankly one more bit of pressure I put on myself to accomplish - so much for zen! I voted for 3 but if you want to write, Write! Some of the best ideas are stream of conciousness. I’ll be happy to search for a topic that piques my interest.

Craig Harper Says:

November 4th, 2007, 8:53 am

Hey Leo,
If you’re like me and you’ve got a lot of things happening in your life outside of blogging I reckon three is perfect.
Craig

..ak Says:

November 4th, 2007, 10:10 am

I’m for quality over quantity. I say 3/week.

I would put a minimum of two quality posts per week with a maximum of five quality posts. Any less is too sporadic, any more would be information overload.

The times I look for good posts are:
- Monday mornings to kick start my week
- Wednesday morning to get through the week
- Friday afternoon to get ready for the weekend

There also comes a point where you need to stop posting and do something, so you have something good to post the next time.

Nathan Judd Says:

November 4th, 2007, 11:46 am

The idea behind ZenHabits is to change individuals for the better, not overwhelm them. Most times I only focus on changing 1-2 things at a time, as you’ve suggested. If I want/need to read more you have many previous posts that I haven’t implemented in my life.

I agree with ak, 3 is great, with the occasional extra post on something you want to address. We, as readers, don’t want posting to be a chore and quality over quantity seems to be a theme in comments.

Grace Says:

November 4th, 2007, 13:28 pm

Hi Leo,

I agree with the QoQ folks. Five posts per week are great, but three posts per week would be fine too. Zen Habits has been very helpful to me; I have been able to make some changes based on suggestions I have read here. Keep up the good work, but if writing five posts per week is stressing you out, you should drop back a bit.

Grace

Garth Says:

November 4th, 2007, 15:02 pm

Quality over quantity and articles don’t have to be long at all if it doesn’t have to be. 3 times a week is pushing it.

Connie Says:

November 4th, 2007, 15:22 pm

I think if you are feeling stressed about the number of posts you are writing, or feel you need and/or want to write - meditate. You’ll have your answer; you’ll know.

It’s thoughtful to ask your readers how many posts they think is optimum, but this is obviously more about you - you do the work. Plus it’s unlikely you’ll get the answer you are looking for.

I’m thinking also that writing/posting when you are stressed could affect the quality of your posts and then, because you obviously care and are conscientious about content, you would be more stressed and then …

One question - do you need a schedule written in stone?

Claire Says:

November 4th, 2007, 15:59 pm

3 a week is perfect for me. Ever since slimming down my rss feeds to 10 (thanks to your article…) I’m only checking my feeds once or twice a week, so this keeps it managable!

Craig Says:

November 4th, 2007, 16:21 pm

Quality or Quantity… 2-3 quality articles is good; spending more times reading could be considered procrastinating real change…

HP Says:

November 4th, 2007, 16:22 pm

Two really good articles are perfect for me.

Leo Says:

November 4th, 2007, 17:57 pm

So many great comments here … I wish I could respond to all of them!

Quality over quantity … I definitely hear that. :)

@Connie: No, I don’t need a schedule written in stone, but it does help me … I like a little structure to my work week, so if I know I’m going to write 5 articles, I can budget my time accordingly.

Five articles a week, even if they’re my best quality articles (which I try for every week), is not too much work for me or too stressful. It’s just that I’ve noticed some other blogs that do as well as I do, but only post 2-3 times a week … and their readers seem to actually prefer that. If you guys preferred 2-3 per week, instead of 5, I would want to give you that. But I’m hearing that 5 isn’t too much … although 3 would be OK if I didn’t have time to write 5 quality posts.

After reading the comments and seeing the poll, let’s just say this:

1. I’m going to keep the schedule pretty much the same, for now.

2. If I get pressed for time, rather than trying to stick to the schedule, I’ll cut back on the posts in any given week. Quality is more important than keeping the schedule.

3. I will probably continue to run guest posts from other bloggers to supplement my writing — but not as much as I have the last few weeks. I usually shoot for 1 guest post per week, and I think that’s a good amount … it gives you guys a good mix of content without taking away from my writing. Note: I already have a lot of guest posts submitted, so please don’t write to me about submitting one. I’m overloaded with them as it is. :)

4. I reserve the right to deviate from the schedule, to post extra stuff if I feel like it, and so on. I don’t like to lock myself in to one set schedule … if I feel like writing about something else, gosh darn it, I’m gonna! :)

I really appreciate all the encouragement and honest feedback, my friends. Thanks for caring enough to vote and leave comments. You guys are the best.

Den Says:

November 4th, 2007, 19:10 pm

As for how many posts per week, do what works best for you.
What’s really important is the quality of the content of each of your postings. Thus far, they’ve been excellent!

Julie Says:

November 4th, 2007, 19:24 pm

3 to 5 posts a week is fine. That’s why I voted for 4!

unstuffed Says:

November 4th, 2007, 19:53 pm

I’m with Zoom. I voted for 5, but would be happy with as many as you feel able to write (and happy with what you’ve written). The themed days is a great idea, and I find I look forward eagerly to the simplicity and organising ones, and sometimes skip the diet/fitness/exercise ones.

One thing that might be interesting, aside from all the other good suggestions people have made, is some kind of “The story so far…” ongoing post. I’m thinking of something where you (or someone) commit to a particular goal, and give us weekly updates on how it’s going. A bit like the 100-thing challenge, probably. That would be a series that would:
a) give us a window into how you do things;
b) provide continuity and flow;
c) maybe inspire some of us to go along with you; and
d) give you a fairly easy post for one day a week ;-).

Susan Hunter Says:

November 4th, 2007, 20:50 pm

I voted for 5 - it’s wonderful to prepare for work every morning by reading a zen habits post. I especially like the different posts for different days schedule.

On the other hand, I’m with everyone else on quality over quantity. Since it sounds like getting guest posts is not a problem, my ideal would be that if you’re feeling time pressure or generally unable to put a post together, to substitute with a guest post so that I can still start my day off on the right Zen foot. :)

michaeld Says:

November 5th, 2007, 5:57 am

Firstly….well done for providing a very professional site.

I voted 2 per week. I’d love more but to be honest I’d not have time to read them.

The most important thing is the quality and also to read a well written article - that takes time and to be honest even two per week would be difficult to sustain.

Keep up the great work.

Pril Says:

November 5th, 2007, 11:00 am

Would love to have like 10 a day but that isn’t really realistic !
I would like to see about 3 a week!
this give you time to delevlop great work
as well as me not worried if i missed one or not!
plus i find myself going back throught the older ones and make them new to myself again by reading them 2 times!
So many GREAT items on here Love the new design too1

Jim Barker Says:

November 5th, 2007, 13:19 pm

Leo,
I’m a black belt instructor in my off hours and run a digital marketing company during the day. I really enjoy reading your posts… what about considering 3 days a week? (Mon, Wed & Fri). We recently started a blog called http://www.greenproductoftheday.com and it became evident to my business partner that daily blogging is a daunting task, so I completely appreciate where you are coming from.

Thanks for the great blog. I’ll continue to digg your articles and let my friends know about your site.

Best regards,

Jim

Rudy Says:

November 5th, 2007, 15:19 pm

Hmm, the vote button doesn’t seem to work. Maybe it’s just me?

Sheila Says:

November 5th, 2007, 15:29 pm

I’m completely fine with five . . . it’s a nice little daily reward to motivate me each weekday!

Arif Says:

November 6th, 2007, 4:26 am

Three is enough for me, baby.

Timuche Says:

November 7th, 2007, 17:05 pm

“Less is more” isn’t the new motto ?

What about 2 posts a week plus a vintage past post ?