<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Compassion Towards Animals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/</link>
	<description>Simple Productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:06:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda Lynn</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-60876</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-60876</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this, Leo. I couldn&#039;t agree more. I made a personal decision a long time ago to become a vegetarian. It was a decision based on the compassion I feel for all animals. I would never judge others who have not made the same choice, however, personally speaking I will not eat a once living thing that could have implored me not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this, Leo. I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I made a personal decision a long time ago to become a vegetarian. It was a decision based on the compassion I feel for all animals. I would never judge others who have not made the same choice, however, personally speaking I will not eat a once living thing that could have implored me not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-59010</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-59010</guid>
		<description>Without wanting to fan the flames of, what could quickly become an ugly debate, I would like to make the point that interfering with any part of the food chain is ultimately unsustainable and therefore abstaining from eating animals is fundamentally a flawed notion usually preceded by &#039;fluffy&#039; feelings, engendered by the large eyes of baby cows, towards the lives that are being saved. 

It is natural for us to eat meat and it is one of the reasons, as a species, that we managed to survive the ice age and other threats to our existence. The ability to adapt and not be fixed to a single source of food is hugely beneficial in evolutionary terms. If we were to stop eating meat altogether initially there would be millions of animals whose lives would be made far worse as they would no longer be fed by us and would have to fend for themselves. But after they perished and a natural equilibrium was reached those wild cows and pigs would not find a utopian existence, they would be forced to compete with each other, and existing wildlife, for resources (which arguably we would also require in order to replace the meat in our diet). 

To be clear I have no issue with people who cannot eat meat or other foods for medical reasons, but to do it under the guise of compassion for the animals is misguided and, in my current understanding, warrants proper investigation - I am happy to be pointed to information to the contrary. For the moment I hold the same view as Eriq Nelson, that of making the lives of the animals I eat as natural and &#039;happy&#039; as is reasonable and to &#039;honour&#039; them by eating as much of them as possible, an attitude I have in common with Hugh Fernley-Whittingstall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without wanting to fan the flames of, what could quickly become an ugly debate, I would like to make the point that interfering with any part of the food chain is ultimately unsustainable and therefore abstaining from eating animals is fundamentally a flawed notion usually preceded by &#8216;fluffy&#8217; feelings, engendered by the large eyes of baby cows, towards the lives that are being saved. </p>
<p>It is natural for us to eat meat and it is one of the reasons, as a species, that we managed to survive the ice age and other threats to our existence. The ability to adapt and not be fixed to a single source of food is hugely beneficial in evolutionary terms. If we were to stop eating meat altogether initially there would be millions of animals whose lives would be made far worse as they would no longer be fed by us and would have to fend for themselves. But after they perished and a natural equilibrium was reached those wild cows and pigs would not find a utopian existence, they would be forced to compete with each other, and existing wildlife, for resources (which arguably we would also require in order to replace the meat in our diet). </p>
<p>To be clear I have no issue with people who cannot eat meat or other foods for medical reasons, but to do it under the guise of compassion for the animals is misguided and, in my current understanding, warrants proper investigation &#8211; I am happy to be pointed to information to the contrary. For the moment I hold the same view as Eriq Nelson, that of making the lives of the animals I eat as natural and &#8216;happy&#8217; as is reasonable and to &#8216;honour&#8217; them by eating as much of them as possible, an attitude I have in common with Hugh Fernley-Whittingstall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eriq Nelson</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58993</link>
		<dc:creator>Eriq Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58993</guid>
		<description>We must balance our compassion towards animals with a recognition of our place in the natural world. I think that every person who eats meat should have the experience of raising and getting to know an animal before killing it with their own hands and eating it. There is nothing worse than disassociation from the natural cycle. For some of us, it is impossible to be vegetarian. I find myself being both allergic to beans and hypoglycemic by birth so I have no choice about whether I eat meat or not. The best I can do is honor the animals I must kill to survive and try to make their sacrifice worthwhile. Wanton cruelty and factory farming are useless actions, they only generate suffering. Responsible animal husbandry should be part of any compassionate society and omnivores should shoulder the burden of ensuring that it is practiced. Please, support local herders and farmers who don&#039;t treat their animals like objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must balance our compassion towards animals with a recognition of our place in the natural world. I think that every person who eats meat should have the experience of raising and getting to know an animal before killing it with their own hands and eating it. There is nothing worse than disassociation from the natural cycle. For some of us, it is impossible to be vegetarian. I find myself being both allergic to beans and hypoglycemic by birth so I have no choice about whether I eat meat or not. The best I can do is honor the animals I must kill to survive and try to make their sacrifice worthwhile. Wanton cruelty and factory farming are useless actions, they only generate suffering. Responsible animal husbandry should be part of any compassionate society and omnivores should shoulder the burden of ensuring that it is practiced. Please, support local herders and farmers who don&#8217;t treat their animals like objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compassionate</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58974</link>
		<dc:creator>Compassionate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58974</guid>
		<description>@Danny Garant

You are a bigger and better person than I am for forgiving and offering a hug - I accept. Sorry for making you so upset with my views and the manner in which I expressed them. I hope your anger towards me finds a release and that you feel better. All the best to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Danny Garant</p>
<p>You are a bigger and better person than I am for forgiving and offering a hug &#8211; I accept. Sorry for making you so upset with my views and the manner in which I expressed them. I hope your anger towards me finds a release and that you feel better. All the best to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Garant</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58923</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Garant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58923</guid>
		<description>@Compasisinate

You are right. I&#039;m angry, upset and think you a jerk. To overly use the article &quot;you&quot; and pretending to know how I feel and think tend to do that to me. Nevertheless, I forgive you, give you a big hug and  you&#039;re welcome to come to my land so we can continue the exchanges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Compasisinate</p>
<p>You are right. I&#8217;m angry, upset and think you a jerk. To overly use the article &#8220;you&#8221; and pretending to know how I feel and think tend to do that to me. Nevertheless, I forgive you, give you a big hug and  you&#8217;re welcome to come to my land so we can continue the exchanges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58876</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58876</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see people&#039;s reaction to Peter Singer. I have read both Animal Liberation and Practical Ethics but he seems to suggest that it is OK to eat animals as long as steps are taken to ensure their life is as free from pain as it can reasonably be made so. 

He is not an advocate of becoming a vegetarian and actually warns of the detrimental effect on the welfare of millions of animals if we were all to cease to eat meat.

I agree with many of his ideas and minimising animal suffering is something that resonates with me, I have no desire to cause any sentient being any discomfort or pain. 

In the UK we are currently in the middle of &quot;The Great British food fight&quot; in which celebrity chefs such as Hugh Fernley-Whittingstall and Jamie Oliver campaign for a better life for animals. I am pleased to say that there seems to be pretty good support for their campaigns which shows a lot of people also feel the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see people&#8217;s reaction to Peter Singer. I have read both Animal Liberation and Practical Ethics but he seems to suggest that it is OK to eat animals as long as steps are taken to ensure their life is as free from pain as it can reasonably be made so. </p>
<p>He is not an advocate of becoming a vegetarian and actually warns of the detrimental effect on the welfare of millions of animals if we were all to cease to eat meat.</p>
<p>I agree with many of his ideas and minimising animal suffering is something that resonates with me, I have no desire to cause any sentient being any discomfort or pain. </p>
<p>In the UK we are currently in the middle of &#8220;The Great British food fight&#8221; in which celebrity chefs such as Hugh Fernley-Whittingstall and Jamie Oliver campaign for a better life for animals. I am pleased to say that there seems to be pretty good support for their campaigns which shows a lot of people also feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compassionate</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58750</link>
		<dc:creator>Compassionate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58750</guid>
		<description>@Danny Garant

I&#039;m glad that your friend has succeeded in taking you to a vegan restarurant. You are angry, you see, because you are taking this personally. The &quot;higher choice&quot; being made by those who don&#039;t eat animals is my opinion. My question to you, and others like you (who respond with anger etc), is that why would such an opinion get under your skin so much? It&#039;s an opinion isn&#039;t it? Why react so strongly to a simple opinion?

Why? Because you think &quot;your way&quot; is better? Because no one can suggest that you might be making an inferior choice to them? Because your way of life, whatever that may be, is coming under attack? Because you are the hottest thing that ever happend to this planet?

Personally, I am not looking for any &quot;victory&quot; in trying to convert you. In fact, I am sure that more I try to &quot;convert&quot; you, the less likely you will convert. And I know that because too much of your ego has been invested in telling people like me to &quot;screw you.&quot; 

The things I write is more for the people who are sitting on the fence - there 85000 subscribers here - and not so emotionally invested as you are. My hope is not that they will convert, but that they will give this idea a rational thought. And if that happens, it could bring a little more compassion on this planet and I will have achieved my purpose. 

As for compassion having nothing to do with vegetarianism, I disagree. Choosing a non-vegetarian life-style means that you support killing of an animal, directly or indirectly. That means, to me, that you are not exercising compassion towards animals. Simple, straight forward logic. 

As for eating human flesh, why wait till &quot;it&#039;s needed?&quot; Why not do it now? Go ahead. On the other hand, why aren&#039;t you eating animals as a &quot;last resort?&quot;  

As for an Indian hunter showing dignity, honor etc for his prey, 99% of hunting today is for recreational reasons. It&#039;s the hypocisy of the worst kind to say that people actually care for the honor and dignity of its prey while they could be easily entertaining themselves by playing tennis. 

The thirst for blood is perhaps thrilling and exciting to them. Blood sport has done that for humans for centuries. And they are enitiled to it. All I am saying is that those of who choose a roller-coaster ride for a thrill are making a higher choice than them because it&#039;s a more compassionate choice. 

You are angry because, within the context of being compassionate, you are on the wrong side of the argument. You are trying to make make your actions guilt-free by using reason - which is actually working against you. Pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Danny Garant</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that your friend has succeeded in taking you to a vegan restarurant. You are angry, you see, because you are taking this personally. The &#8220;higher choice&#8221; being made by those who don&#8217;t eat animals is my opinion. My question to you, and others like you (who respond with anger etc), is that why would such an opinion get under your skin so much? It&#8217;s an opinion isn&#8217;t it? Why react so strongly to a simple opinion?</p>
<p>Why? Because you think &#8220;your way&#8221; is better? Because no one can suggest that you might be making an inferior choice to them? Because your way of life, whatever that may be, is coming under attack? Because you are the hottest thing that ever happend to this planet?</p>
<p>Personally, I am not looking for any &#8220;victory&#8221; in trying to convert you. In fact, I am sure that more I try to &#8220;convert&#8221; you, the less likely you will convert. And I know that because too much of your ego has been invested in telling people like me to &#8220;screw you.&#8221; </p>
<p>The things I write is more for the people who are sitting on the fence &#8211; there 85000 subscribers here &#8211; and not so emotionally invested as you are. My hope is not that they will convert, but that they will give this idea a rational thought. And if that happens, it could bring a little more compassion on this planet and I will have achieved my purpose. </p>
<p>As for compassion having nothing to do with vegetarianism, I disagree. Choosing a non-vegetarian life-style means that you support killing of an animal, directly or indirectly. That means, to me, that you are not exercising compassion towards animals. Simple, straight forward logic. </p>
<p>As for eating human flesh, why wait till &#8220;it&#8217;s needed?&#8221; Why not do it now? Go ahead. On the other hand, why aren&#8217;t you eating animals as a &#8220;last resort?&#8221;  </p>
<p>As for an Indian hunter showing dignity, honor etc for his prey, 99% of hunting today is for recreational reasons. It&#8217;s the hypocisy of the worst kind to say that people actually care for the honor and dignity of its prey while they could be easily entertaining themselves by playing tennis. </p>
<p>The thirst for blood is perhaps thrilling and exciting to them. Blood sport has done that for humans for centuries. And they are enitiled to it. All I am saying is that those of who choose a roller-coaster ride for a thrill are making a higher choice than them because it&#8217;s a more compassionate choice. </p>
<p>You are angry because, within the context of being compassionate, you are on the wrong side of the argument. You are trying to make make your actions guilt-free by using reason &#8211; which is actually working against you. Pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58441</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58441</guid>
		<description>I have recently subscribed to you blog and was VERY happy to see this a couple days into subscribing.

As a vegan, I am soooooo sick and tired of people&#039;s ridiculous notions about our need for another animals flesh or the milk they produce for their offspring.  If people would just stop for ONE SECOND and look into what they are eating and their real needs, maybe the would see the inaccuracies in their statements.  We need more people speaking out about compassion towards animals, not less so thank you for making this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently subscribed to you blog and was VERY happy to see this a couple days into subscribing.</p>
<p>As a vegan, I am soooooo sick and tired of people&#8217;s ridiculous notions about our need for another animals flesh or the milk they produce for their offspring.  If people would just stop for ONE SECOND and look into what they are eating and their real needs, maybe the would see the inaccuracies in their statements.  We need more people speaking out about compassion towards animals, not less so thank you for making this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey - Swollen Thumb Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58389</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey - Swollen Thumb Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58389</guid>
		<description>@ tt&#039;s last message

Thank you for saying that!  I&#039;ve been trying to stay out of this dogmatic discussion, but I couldn&#039;t figure out how to say what I wanted to without coming off as intolerant.  You took the words out of my mouth.  I subscribe 100% to what you wrote.

I just don&#039;t understand how the people who bring their religion in here think that it has ANYTHING to do with Zen.  Learn to respect other people&#039;s religions, and never use your own religion as a way to settle a discussion.

I believe that one day, cheescake will rain from the sky.  That proves that God wants us to eat dairy products.  Now the burden is on you people to prove me wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ tt&#8217;s last message</p>
<p>Thank you for saying that!  I&#8217;ve been trying to stay out of this dogmatic discussion, but I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to say what I wanted to without coming off as intolerant.  You took the words out of my mouth.  I subscribe 100% to what you wrote.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t understand how the people who bring their religion in here think that it has ANYTHING to do with Zen.  Learn to respect other people&#8217;s religions, and never use your own religion as a way to settle a discussion.</p>
<p>I believe that one day, cheescake will rain from the sky.  That proves that God wants us to eat dairy products.  Now the burden is on you people to prove me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Garant</title>
		<link>http://zenhabits.net/2009/01/on-compassion-towards-animals/#comment-58381</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Garant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zenhabits.net/?p=2356#comment-58381</guid>
		<description>@Compassionate : The tone and semantic of your messages are those that irritate me. I feel it as moralizing as religious progranda as Christina show it. Also, I don&#039;t pretend to hold the absolute TRUTH about what is lower or higher and I would be showing arrogance to think otherwise. I resent your post cause they are pretending holding that unreachable TRUTH. I would never turn vegan if I&#039;m feeling insulted by the promoter. Your only succed to rise my anger. While I&#039;m angry, I don&#039;t listen properly. You know what is worst in your case, is that someone already succed where you failed. She used the simpliest trick to bring me to veganism : she invited me to a vegan restaurant. 
Oh, for the record, I would eat human flesh in last resort, if needed.

This discussion is about compassion regarding animals. Not veganism/vegetarism. 
I do consider that a native american asking his prey to allow him to kill it so he can feed himself and his family to be most compassionate. The hunter is also showing respect, honor, dignity and that he understand the cycles of nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Compassionate : The tone and semantic of your messages are those that irritate me. I feel it as moralizing as religious progranda as Christina show it. Also, I don&#8217;t pretend to hold the absolute TRUTH about what is lower or higher and I would be showing arrogance to think otherwise. I resent your post cause they are pretending holding that unreachable TRUTH. I would never turn vegan if I&#8217;m feeling insulted by the promoter. Your only succed to rise my anger. While I&#8217;m angry, I don&#8217;t listen properly. You know what is worst in your case, is that someone already succed where you failed. She used the simpliest trick to bring me to veganism : she invited me to a vegan restaurant.<br />
Oh, for the record, I would eat human flesh in last resort, if needed.</p>
<p>This discussion is about compassion regarding animals. Not veganism/vegetarism.<br />
I do consider that a native american asking his prey to allow him to kill it so he can feed himself and his family to be most compassionate. The hunter is also showing respect, honor, dignity and that he understand the cycles of nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
